Search for: "2 Unknown-Named IRS Employees"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2017, 7:50 pm
Cal.) -- ruling that: (1) IRS failed to demonstrate that it performed reasonable search for responsive records; (2) IRS properly withheld records pursuant to Exemptions 5, 7(A), and 7(D); (3) IRS failed to address whether "Risk Score" withheld under Exemption 7(E) was technique unknown to public; and (4) judgment would be reserved as to Exemptions 3, 6, and 7(C) until record was further developed.Frost v. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 8:12 pm
According to the allegations, the employee provided the unknown person with W-2 information for nearly 16,000 employees including names, addresses, Social Security Numbers, and other personal identifying information (PII). [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 8:22 am
If the basis for paid sick and paid family leave is childcare, the employee must provide: (1) the name of the son or daughter; (2) the name of the school or place of care that has closed; (3) and a representation that no other suitable person will be caring for the son or daughter during the period of leave. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:00 pm
May 4 – DOL/IRS Final Rule: Extension of Certain Timeframes for Employee Benefit Plans, Participants & Beneficiaries Affected by the COVID-19 Outbreak – Verrill commentary: IRS and DOL Extend Certain Health & Welfare Benefit Plan-Related Deadlines & COVID-19 Extension Guidance Makes the Interplay Between COBRA and Medicare (a Bit) Trickier A joint DOL and IRS notice provides unprecedented extensions of certain HIPAA, COBRA, and claims… [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 10:52 am
It has all happened before and history shows it will all happen again if we put it all aside in the name of moving forward. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:54 am
It is not difficult to see the IRS putting together a number of these requests to find the names of previously unknown taxpayers, and it may well explain the recent announcement by Credit Suisse (we wrote about this tax problem here) that it has been required by the SFTA to turn over the names of some of its clients to the IRS. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 4:00 pm
2. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:09 am
It is not clear what store the defendants were using, nor is it clear whether the store's employees allegedly knew that the refund checks were fraudulently obtained. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 5:27 am
Scared of the unknown future. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 10:31 am
If the client is a W-2 employee, they could ask that a bonus be held for a while, defer salary, make extra payments to the IRS, send extra payments to their insurance company, prepay expenses, even create fake debt payable to a sympathetic family member or friend. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:18 pm
Marietta Memorial Hospital Employee Health Benefit Plan v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 6:41 am
I have observed calls come in where the caller id. says “unknown caller. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:19 am
Federal: Thousands of Missing Emails at IRS: What’s it all about? [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
In general, a key employee (1) had reportable annual compensation exceeding $150,000, (2) had or shared organizational control or influence comparable to a director or officer or had authority or control over at least 10% of the organization's activities, and (3) were within the group of the top twenty compensated employees.The assets associated with a particular project might be reachable by general creditors of its sponsor in a bankruptcy. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:50 am
ADEA Record Retention Complicating matters, the EEOC has a different employment recordkeeping and retention approach in a different set of regulations adopted under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) These regulations require maintaining and keeping for three years the following information on all employees: Name Address Date of birth Occupation Rate of pay Compensation earned each week Note: date of birth is essential in responding to charges of age discrimination,… [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:22 am
Whose Authorization Matters—The Third-Party Accounts of Former Employees Two district courts in Virginia have parsed out a distinction regarding email access to the third-party accounts of former employees: following the employee’s termination, who is allowed to access the account and whose permission is required? [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
§ 5911(a)(2). [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
§ 5911(a)(2). [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 11:38 am
§ 5911(a)(2). [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 7:30 pm
You are cautioned that matters subject to forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including economic, regulatory, competitive and other factors, which may cause actual results or performance, including the actual terms of the transactions involving NCSLT 2007-3 and NCLST 2007-4, First Marblehead’s actual revenues or yields from the securitization, or the timing of events, to be materially different than those expressed or implied by… [read post]
